Hello? Zecco?
Filed in archive Investing on September 26, 2006
So I read in various places about this new investing startup Zecco that is going to offer free stock trades, and make its money from site advertising versus customer commissions. Then I got an e-mail from a guy at Zecco talking it up.
So, now that I'm remembering to write about it, the Web site, Zecco.com, which is set to be functional on October 9, is just some lame spammy search engine called trafficclub. If Zecco's trying to make a few bucks before the official launch instead of building the hype with an actual Web site, that's lame. If their site has been hacked, that's lame, too. Either way, not an auspicious beginning--and this from a company backed by one of Skype's original backers.
Well, I'll proceed as if the site's fine, using info I've culled from elsewhere.
This post from TechCrunch, which tracks "Web 2.0" companies, has a pretty good assessment of Zecco's chances. The article's basic point is that Zecco is trying to build a business based on price when all its predecessors have already seen the writing on the wall, and are thus expanding into services that bring more money. So, Zecco may undercut ETrade, but what if ETrade says "Fine, our commissions are free, too"? Then Zecco is screwed, because it doesn't have the traction in any other investing products. It might hasten the day that all stock trades are free (just as Skype, et al, are hastening the day that long distance phone service will be free), but does it have another trick up its sleeve when it comes to surviving that post-apocalyptic world? (Not to be too dramatic.)
The other point made at TechCrunch is that the days of a booming market that attracts active traders are gone--most people have moved back to slow-go investing and do little trading. The market that would have been huge in 2000 is considerably smaller now, which is why the ETrades of the world have been trying to expand their services--relying on stock trade commissions is not a healthy business model.
Zecco's going to try to be more than a trading platform, and that's where it stands a chance. Zecco can lure customers with free trades, then pitch them on its "community", which will include forums, blogs, etc. It's "the intersection where online brokerage meets Yahoo Finance and Myspace" according to Zecco. With enough participants, feeding ads to the community might make some money, and of course if enough are roped in, then selling financial products that actually cost money could be in their future.
There's always a danger in giving something free, though--you attract people that want something for nothing. And if they come based on that promise, they're unlikely to start pulling out their wallets. Zecco could end up in the business of counting eyeballs in the hopes of surviving on ad revenue, a dicey proposition.
I'm all for free trades, though, no doubt about that. And if ETrade doesn't react to this with free trades of their own, I might just switch. Zecco will be interesting to watch, at least if their Web site starts showing something other than spammy fake search results.
P.S. I should mention that Zecco got its act together and its site actually appears now at http://www.zecco.com.
P.P.S. Be sure to check out the second comment below from Soren Kenner, who straightens out a few things concerning Zecco's business model.

Permalink: Hello? Zecco?
Tags: investing
Vote for Hello? Zecco?:
|
Rating: 6.75 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Steven Burda, MBA
(09/26/06 2:51am)
Response from:
Soren Kenner
(10/02/06 1:17pm)
Hi. Good article! I am on the Zecco team and just wanted to comment on a few of your assumptions.
1. Website functionality .. stil in beta but come back after the 9th and you will find a very comprehensive offering that mixes blogs, financial portal and the ability to trade with Zero commissions.
2. Pricing. You have misunderstood the underlying business model. We offer Zero Commission trades which cost us around $2 a piece instead of spending the approx $6 per transaction that E*trade etc. spends. We think 'free' will attract customers (it is certainly already getting us a lot of attention). But here is how we will make our money. From interest on accounts and margin trading -- this incidentally also accounts for around 66% of E*trades earnings. On top of that our running costs are lower because we are running on the latest asp-solutions instead of on old legacy systems like E*Trade and others.
3. What if E*Trade does away with commissions? They wont. Last year they had about $400 million revenue from commissions but their costs are at a level where they would be posing a loss of around $300 million a year if they do away with commissions.
4. Attracting Active Traders. At the moment the ranks of online traders are swelling to the tune of more than 150.000 new customers a month ... the fastest growth ever seen in the industry. Most of these are people that invest for college, retirement, their next house etc. And this is just the sort of investors we would like as customers. They have a reasonable amount of trades (meaning cost us less to sustain), usually have solid account balances (meaning we make some interest) and many of them like to trade on margin (which we will also profit from). Our bet is that we can give the consumer a way better deal than the other brokers and still make a handsome profit.
Anyways ... I hope this brings some clarification.
BTW ... I really like your blog. It is exactly the type of blog we would like to have on Zecco.com --- and as you will be aware we will split our advertising revenue with you. You can syndicate this blog to share with Zecco and soon be able to be seen by many more people.
I hope you'll stop by on the 9th of October for our launch and give the site a test-drive ... I'd be very interested in hearing your opions onc we get underway.
Kind regards
Soren Kenner
1. Website functionality .. stil in beta but come back after the 9th and you will find a very comprehensive offering that mixes blogs, financial portal and the ability to trade with Zero commissions.
2. Pricing. You have misunderstood the underlying business model. We offer Zero Commission trades which cost us around $2 a piece instead of spending the approx $6 per transaction that E*trade etc. spends. We think 'free' will attract customers (it is certainly already getting us a lot of attention). But here is how we will make our money. From interest on accounts and margin trading -- this incidentally also accounts for around 66% of E*trades earnings. On top of that our running costs are lower because we are running on the latest asp-solutions instead of on old legacy systems like E*Trade and others.
3. What if E*Trade does away with commissions? They wont. Last year they had about $400 million revenue from commissions but their costs are at a level where they would be posing a loss of around $300 million a year if they do away with commissions.
4. Attracting Active Traders. At the moment the ranks of online traders are swelling to the tune of more than 150.000 new customers a month ... the fastest growth ever seen in the industry. Most of these are people that invest for college, retirement, their next house etc. And this is just the sort of investors we would like as customers. They have a reasonable amount of trades (meaning cost us less to sustain), usually have solid account balances (meaning we make some interest) and many of them like to trade on margin (which we will also profit from). Our bet is that we can give the consumer a way better deal than the other brokers and still make a handsome profit.
Anyways ... I hope this brings some clarification.
BTW ... I really like your blog. It is exactly the type of blog we would like to have on Zecco.com --- and as you will be aware we will split our advertising revenue with you. You can syndicate this blog to share with Zecco and soon be able to be seen by many more people.
I hope you'll stop by on the 9th of October for our launch and give the site a test-drive ... I'd be very interested in hearing your opions onc we get underway.
Kind regards
Soren Kenner
Response from:
Zecco Review
(06/17/07 10:17pm)
Steven makes a good point: competition is surely to heat up once Zecco completes a full year of commission-free service.
TD Ameritrade and other brokerages must lower their fees to attract all the lost business. I still think $10 per trade is a lot, especially considering most brokerages send the trades electronically to be filled. Why should I have to pay for that?
I couldn't resist for long, and opened a Zecco account a few weeks back. I wrote a detailed zecco')" rel="nofollow">http://www.investortrip.com/zecco-review/">zecco
review to walk others through the sign-up process, which tends to drag on a bit. But if you have 20 spare minutes, it's worth the wait.
TD Ameritrade and other brokerages must lower their fees to attract all the lost business. I still think $10 per trade is a lot, especially considering most brokerages send the trades electronically to be filled. Why should I have to pay for that?
I couldn't resist for long, and opened a Zecco account a few weeks back. I wrote a detailed zecco')" rel="nofollow">http://www.investortrip.com/zecco-review/">zecco
review to walk others through the sign-up process, which tends to drag on a bit. But if you have 20 spare minutes, it's worth the wait.
| RSS | |
|
| |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Follow us on Twitter! |
Most Popular
About This Site
Banking
Best of
Blogging Issues
Book Reviews
Buying Stuff
Careers and Money
Charity
Credit
Did you know
Economy
Education
Finance
Financial Advisors
Funny
General
Greatest Hits
Happiness
Health
Housing

-Steven Burda